Several weeks ago I was forwarded a reply a friend had received on the Helen Thomas story, which he had posted on his page on a social networking sight. [In case you are unfamiliar with the story, you can read about it here.] Due to time constraints, I was unable to discuss this in depth, until now.
The reply went as follows;
"Helen Thomas just proved she was a hateful moonbat - I defend her freedom
of speech, but denounce her hatefulness. She spoke her way into
irrelevance - What if Bret Baier said that "Negros are not Americans- they
all should go back to Africa?"
I'll break this up and insert my comments in bold:
"Helen Thomas just proved she was a hateful moonbat..."
there is nothing wrong with hate. It is a natural instinctive defense mechanism that every race of the human species shares. To say there is something inherently wrong with feeling such an emotion is as absurd as repudiating "love" on the same basis. In fact, I'm sure a strong case could be made showing that "love" has its own rap sheet of misdeeds.
..."I defend her freedom of speech..."
No you don't. Let's cut the Voltairian grandstanding and be truthful. No one really likes freedom of speech. That is to say, they want their opinions voiced, but would much rather have their opponent's views silenced. We see it in hate crime legislation, which is nothing more than criminalizing perceived thoughts. How many people have lost their jobs, been thrown in prison or been ostracized in this country for expressing a politically incorrect opinion on race? Hell, Even yours truly would have no problem crushing a militant street parade of dildo waving homosexuals who felt it was "their right" to gambol through my neighborhood half dressed and fully degenerate.
"...but denounce her hatefulness."
There's that word again. This time it's accompanied by the verb, denounce. The poster conjures images of a witch-finder general, forcefully coercing guilty pleas from heretics. I wonder if this poster would denounce my "hatefulness" if I expressed an opinion that child molesters should be strung up by their genitalia and be flogged with tire irons? Somehow, I think the whole "hate" stigma is somewhat subjective.
"...she spoke her way into irrelevance..."
Now it seems the age old practice of shunning is being implied, sub-rosa.
"...What if Bret Baier said that "Negros are not Americans- they
all should go back to Africa?"
Well of course if a negative reference were made against Negros heads would roll. We've seen it happen many times, from John Rocker, Don Imus Trent Lott, etc. That is a poor analogy. Blacks are a protected class in this country. The smallest assumed slight against them is sprayed across the MSM almost daily. A better analogy would be to see what would happen if the roles were reversed. What if it was a non-White talking about Whites? Well, let's see:
“We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what I mean by that is if the worst comes to the worst, we have got to kill him.”
– Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez, founder of La Raza
“And the one idea is, how we are going to exterminate white people because that in my estimation is the only conclusion I have come to. We have to exterminate white people off the face of the planet to solve this problem.”
- African Studies professor, Dr. Kamau Kambon
“The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists. Make no mistake about it we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed–not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed.”
- Jewish studies professor, Dr Noel Ignatiev
Never heard about those, eh? Let me just point out that none of these people are worried about "speaking thier way into irrelevance." In fact, as far as I know, they still hold their lofty positions and are celebrated as esteemed leaders of their respective kin. And their comments seem much more to the point. They want Whites to immigrate to another land, alright. Only difference is they want them to be six feet under it and are more than willing to act as homicidal flight pilot.
The kicker to all this is the poster considers himself/herself a Republican. You see, the liberal programming has turned even the right into nothing more than modern day Manchurian candidates, repeating the same by rote new-speak the left usually attacks with. It comes as no shock though, since our society has become a feminized one. Where White patriarchy, the cornerstone of our civilization, has slowly been chipped away at by Jewish subversives, moral universalists, feminists, etc. We live in an age where White men are portrayed on television and through the media as enervated, flavorless drones or amorphous, rictus faced children. It is an age of "fairness" and "equality." Where hurting a protected class' feelings is tantamount to murder. Where any instance of masculinity is in need of medication and counseling. It's also an age of broken families, government wet-nursing and an ever growing population of violent, tribal non-Whites turning our lands into the third world cesspools they left behind.
No, I don't think hate is all that bad, really. And contrary to what liberals may wish, it isn't going anywhere anytime soon. It may, in all actuality, be just what we need to stir our people from this liberal nightmare.
